Both the simple random sampling and three forms of forest-type oriented stratified random sampling are the four designs in this comparison study. Samewise, three forms of circular plot sampling, i.e. 0.0125ha, 0.0250ha and 0.0500ha, and two forms of horizontal point sampling i.e. BAF4 and BAF2, are enumerated with the common center or point in every observations. The 140 observations are allocated to the strata according to the degree of precision desired for the particular strata, i.e. 32 for conifer-hardwood plantation, 48 for coniferplantation, 20 for natural hardwood forest, 40 for natural conifer forest. For time and cost concerned, the two forms of horizontal point sampling are superior to three kinds of circular plot sampling whatever the simple random sampling design or stratified random sampling design might be; Among the sampling designs, the horizontal point sampling of BAF 2 is the best, hori zontal sampling of BAF 4 comes next and the circular plot sampling of 0.050ha be the worst; Compared with the simple random sampling, three forms of stra tified random sampling gain in time/cost in corresponding form of horizontal point sampling respectively. The "R1" (BAF2) on 3-stratum stratification is with the least survey time/cost among four different sampling designs and five field enumeration methods.