In photogrammetry, the development phase of image matching is moving into a new era, namely the dense matching. At this phase, there are bottlenecks for blunder detection and quality evaluation of dense matching results, including (1) no output on photo coordinates of matching points, (2) a huge number of matching points, and (3) unstable bundle block adjustment caused by too close matching points. This paper proposes four easy and applicable methods to overcome those bottlenecks. They are visual check, relative orientation (RO) using a huge number of tie points, bundle block adjustment, and comparing with check points. Four matching algorithms are tested, including SIFT-based Multi-image Matching (SMM), Structure from Motion (SfM), DAISY and Semi-Global Matching (SGM). The results show that 50.72% and 47.00% of wrong matching points appear at roof ridge lines and break lines. Only 0.05% of those wrong matching points are located in homogeneous color area. This might be for reference for development and application of image dense matching. Test results of RO method demonstrate that SMM and SGM have the wrong matching rate of 2.82% and 2.36%, respectively. The evaluation results of bundle block adjustment method show that the matching accuracy and wrong matching rate of SMM are 0.23pixel and 3.97%, respectively. Both RO and bundle block adjustment methods have the computation speed of 14,984 points/second and 292 points/second, respectively. By comparing 12 check points, the object points measured by SGM have the absolute elevation differences with maximum 0.935GSD, minimum 0.006GSD, average 0.315GSD and RMSD 0.238GSD, where 1GSD=0.168m.